Given my fondness for paradoxes… and, for Raymond Smullyan... I couldn't help but love this weekend post from Ray T. Cook on paradoxes (and why to study them) at

*:*

**Oxford University Press blog****http://tinyurl.com/ppvg4cp**

After offering his own example that he once posed to the master logician Smullyan, Cook goes on to talk about the mathematical complexity of paradoxes before ending thusly:

"...that's why I work on paradoxes: their surprising mathematical complexity and mathematical beauty. Fortunately for me there is still a lot of work that remains to be done, and a lot of complexity and beauty remaining to be discovered."

Fortunately
for me, there is still a lot of work that remains to be done, and a lot
of complexity and beauty remaining to be discovered. - See more at:
http://blog.oup.com/2014/09/why-study-paradoxes/?utm_source=feedblitz&utm_medium=FeedBlitzRss&utm_campaign=oupblogmathematics#sthash.VxyOQRJg.dpuf

that’s
why I work on paradoxes: their surprising mathematical complexity and
mathematical beauty. Fortunately for me, there is still a lot of work
that remains to be done, and a lot of complexity and beauty remaining to
be discovered. - See more at:
http://blog.oup.com/2014/09/why-study-paradoxes/?utm_source=feedblitz&utm_medium=FeedBlitzRss&utm_campaign=oupblogmathematics#sthash.VxyOQRJg.dpuf

that’s
why I work on paradoxes: their surprising mathematical complexity and
mathematical beauty. Fortunately for me, there is still a lot of work
that remains to be done, and a lot of complexity and beauty remaining to
be discovered. - See more at:
http://blog.oup.com/2014/09/why-study-paradoxes/?utm_source=feedblitz&utm_medium=FeedBlitzRss&utm_campaign=oupblogmathematics#sthash.VxyOQRJg.dpuf

And
that’s why I work on paradoxes: their surprising mathematical
complexity and mathematical beauty. Fortunately for me, there is still a
lot of work that remains to be done, and a lot of complexity and beauty
remaining to be discovered. - See more at:
http://blog.oup.com/2014/09/why-study-paradoxes/?utm_source=feedblitz&utm_medium=FeedBlitzRss&utm_campaign=oupblogmathematics#sthash.VxyOQRJg.dpuf

And
that’s why I work on paradoxes: their surprising mathematical
complexity and mathematical beauty. Fortunately for me, there is still a
lot of work that remains to be done, and a lot of complexity and beauty
remaining to be discovered. - See more at:
http://blog.oup.com/2014/09/why-study-paradoxes/?utm_source=feedblitz&utm_medium=FeedBlitzRss&utm_campaign=oupblogmathematics#sthash.VxyOQRJg.dpuf

that’s
why I work on paradoxes: their surprising mathematical complexity and
mathematical beauty. Fortunately for me, there is still a lot of work
that remains to be done, and a lot of complexity and beauty remaining to
be discovered. - See more at:
http://blog.oup.com/2014/09/why-study-paradoxes/?utm_source=feedblitz&utm_medium=FeedBlitzRss&utm_campaign=oupblogmathematics#sthash.VxyOQRJg.dpuf

Also, Ray has apparently written a short book entirely on Yablo's Paradox which I've mentioned here before (and which the above post is related to):

http://ukcatalogue.oup.com/product/9780199669608.do

## No comments:

Post a Comment