tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1227172931607686978.post3089917976265732265..comments2023-08-05T07:54:36.424-04:00Comments on Math-Frolic!: Wow! The Continuum Hypothesis Solved???..."Shecky Riemann"http://www.blogger.com/profile/07065658607024191185noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1227172931607686978.post-54311554125191898422011-08-04T05:29:54.060-04:002011-08-04T05:29:54.060-04:00Of course!! Ughhh, another senior moment (correcte...Of course!! Ughhh, another senior moment (corrected above)..."Shecky Riemann"https://www.blogger.com/profile/07065658607024191185noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1227172931607686978.post-58792684792483339892011-08-03T23:55:16.721-04:002011-08-03T23:55:16.721-04:00CH is much better attributed to Cantor, not Godel....CH is much better attributed to Cantor, not Godel.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1227172931607686978.post-11883296169776471192011-08-03T22:56:26.684-04:002011-08-03T22:56:26.684-04:00In any particular model of ZFC, CH is either true ...In any particular model of ZFC, CH is either true or false. Examples of both are known (Godel found an example where CH is true, Cohen found one where CH is false). This is no more deep nor mystical than saying that some groups are abelian, and some are not: "abelianness is independent of the group axioms".<br /><br />Neither is it particular surprising that CH be a consequence of Sam Alexanderhttp://www.xamuel.comnoreply@blogger.com